In that delightful mix called
intercultural studies—for me, anthropology, theology and linguistics—I especially
enjoy exploring cultural communication styles. Several years ago I was
intrigued to discover that prominent among Hebrew communicational values,
intentional ambiguity stands out. That explains a lot of the difficulty of some
of the biblical passages. It seems that sometimes what is left out of a story
is as important as the plot itself.
I remember wondering why God would
then choose the Hebrew culture and language as a vehicle of revelation. Wouldn’t
it be better to state things plainly, to clear up the mystery, to show us a straight
path forward?
But the poet part of me smiled.
Intentional ambiguity. Why not?
This Hebrew value reaches into the
New Testament, although other languages and cultures also enter the picture. I
hear Jesus asking the disciples, “Do you get it yet?” and then explaining the
parables. I note scholars down through the ages debating the meanings and
interpretations of certain passages. It continues today.
Thank God for the Spirit who
reveals truth as we ask and seek.
And thanks be to Jesus who told his
disciples that love would be a defining mark of the church (“By this shall all
people know you are my disciples….”), not just correct doctrine.
Of course correct doctrine matters,
and Jesus also said that it is the truth that sets us free. Naming our theological
perspectives is an ongoing task of the church, one that needs the input of many
cultures and languages. So we wrestle and wait, listening to each other and to
Jesus, the living Word, as he unfolds to us the written word, the Bible.
I wonder sometimes if love is not
the link between intentional ambiguity, doctrine and witness. I wonder if the
lack of doctrinal clarity we often experience and sharply feel is not the
context for the kind of love that shines in the darkness.
Right now we in Northwest Yearly
Meeting of Friends are wrestling with the profound questions of human
sexuality. We are specifically asking what the Word/word is saying about
committed same sex relationships. We are discovering among us widely
differing perspectives. This diversity
is magnified even more in the greater family of Friends.
In our yearly meeting, I note the
thread of belief in both the living and the written Word. It would be
inaccurate to say we are divided between theological liberals and
fundamentalists. We are all people who want to follow Jesus, adhere to the Bible
and be light in the world. And this is where it gets interesting.
As I ponder the history of the
Christian church, looking specifically at times of controversy, it seems that
either of two scenarios is taking place. Sometimes surrounding cultural values
dilute the message of truth and tempt the church to liberalism. But other
times, it seems that the very Spirit of Christ (the living Word) is prodding us
to new revelation, a fresh interpretation of the written word. What is
happening now with the issue of human sexuality? That’s my question, and I don’t
know.
Intentional ambiguity provides an
opportunity for love.
Not all is ambiguous, of course.
God’s intentions that we love each other and together seek the voice of Christ,
these are clear. This is a time for waiting and listening. It is, as we say in
English, the meantime. Let us, by the way we respect each other, make it “kind”
time. Let us keep strong our hope in the Spirit of Jesus who leads us into all
truth. Let us take the time for that to
happen.